A writ petition regarding a grievance was disposed of on the Administrative Side by the Bombay High Court after it was determined that the request should not be entertained on the judicial side.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
suresh
10-WP-1484.2019.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1484 OF 2019
Jan Adalat & Another Vs. State of Maharashtra & Others
.... Petitioners
.... Respondents
Mr. Siddesh Pilankar h/f Mr. Uday P. Warunjikar for the Petitioners. Mr. B.V. Samant, AGP, for the Respondent-State. Ms Rebecca Gonsalves for Respondent No.3.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & R.I. CHAGLA, JJ. DATE : DECEMBER 16, 2019
P.C:
Heard. The grievance projected in this petition will be looked into on the Administrative Side and an appropriate decision will be taken. We do not think that we should entertain such a request on the judicial side. The petition is disposed of.
(R.I. CHAGLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Digitally signed by SURESH SURESH JAGDISH JAGDISH SAJNAWAT SAJNAWAT Date: 2019.12.20 15:13:22 +0530
Page 1 of 1
Jan Adash & Another
State of Maharashtra
S.C. DHARMADHIKARI
R.I. CHAGLA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
