Disposed

Joshi Shivshankar Jatashankar v. Sitaram Kunte and 3 Ors.

Bombay HC13 Dec 2019CONPW/30/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay disposed of a public interest litigation regarding a land dispute. The court recorded that MHADA had handed over site possession to Adani Electricity Limited as per prior directions and consequently terminated connected miscellaneous proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Disposal of the public interest litigation and incidental proceedings due to compliance with court directions.

Joshi Shivshankar Jatashankar Vs… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

906-PIL.13.2010.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

¶3

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 13 OF 2010

¶4

Shivashankar Jatashankar Joshi } Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. } Respondents

¶5

WITH PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 58 OF 2012

¶6

WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 30 OF 2014 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 109 OF 2013 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 351 OF 2018

¶7

Joshi Shivashankar Jatashankar } Petitioner versus The Secretary, Law and Judiciary } Department, and Ors. } Respondents

¶8

Mr.Shivashankar Jatashankar Joshi-petitioner appearing in-person-absent.

¶9

Ms.Jyoti Chavan-AGP for State.

¶10

Mr.P.G.Lad with Ms.Aparna Murlidharan and Ms.Sayali Apte for MHADA.

¶11

Ms.Kejali H. Mastakar for the Municipal Corporation.

¶12

Mr.Rahul Nerlekar for respondent nos. 4 to 7 in PIL/13/2010 and for respondent nos. 3, 18 and 19 in PIL/58/2012.

¶13

Mr.Tushad Kakalia with Mr.Paresh Patkar I/b. M/s.Mulla and Mulla C. B. and C. for Adani Electricity Limited in NMW/351/2018.

¶14

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & R. I. CHAGLA, JJ.

¶15

DATED :- DECEMBER 13, 2019

¶16

Page 1 of 2

¶17

J.V.SALUNKE,PS

¶18

906-PIL.13.2010.doc

¶19

P.C. :-

¶20

It is stated by the learned advocate appearing for M/s.Adani Electricity Limited that compliance has been made by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) with its statements made to this court and recorded in the prior order of 13^th November, 2019. The site has been handed over to M/s.Adani Electricity Limited for construction of a sub-station. It is stated that for that purpose, time of nine months has been granted. The company says that it will adhere to this time schedule and not seek any extension. The statement is accepted.

¶21

In the light of the above, the public interest litigations are disposed of. In the light of the disposal of the public interest litigations, the notice of motion, the chamber summons and the contempt petition do not survive and stand disposed of as such.

¶22

(R.I.CHAGLA, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

¶23

Page 2 of 2

¶24

J.V.SALUNKE,PS

Joshi Shivshankar Jatashankar v. Sitaram Kunte and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Joshi Shivshankar Jatashankar v. Sitaram Kunte and 3 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uday Shetty Vs Union of India and Ors.

Dattatray Prakash Adarkar Vs Union of India

Help Mumbai Foundation and 2 Ors. Vs Chairman, Railway Board, and 5 Ors.

Ashok Vitthal More Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Dept. of Rural Development and Ors.

Vishnu Tukaram Bhosale Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Dept. of Rural Development and Ors.

Ashok Vitthal More Vs the State of Maharashtra through the Secretary, Dept. of Rural Development and Ors.