Petitioner withdrew the Writ Petition. The Court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Writ Petition allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 15-PILST-34874-2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (STAMP) NO.34874 OF 2019
PRANALI KRUSHNANATH PAWAL
...PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
...RESPONDENTS
Mr. K.M. Gadve Patil, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. S.G. Sangle, AGP for Respondents-State Mr. A.B. Kadethankar, Advocate for Respondent No. 2
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE : 11th NOVEMBER, 2019
PER COURT :
[ ANIL S. KILOR ] [ PRASANNA B. VARALE ] JUDGE JUDGE
mta
PRANALI KRUSHNANATH PAWAL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
PRASANNA B. VARALE
ANIL S. KILOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
