Disposed

Shri. Omkar Arun Survase v. the State of Maharashtra Thru Social Justice and Special Assistance Dept. and Ors.

Bombay HC12 Feb 2019WP/1398/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay disposed of three writ petitions by directing the scrutiny committee to pass final orders within three months, which cannot be extended. The court clarified that no opinion was expressed on the merits of the cases.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the scrutiny committee to pass final orders within three months without extension.

Shri. Omkar Arun Survase Vs the State of Maharashtra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

907to909-WP.1385.2019+2.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 1385 OF 2019

¶4

Vinayak Deepak Surwase } Petitioner versus The Statte of Maharashtra } and Ors. } Respondents

¶5

WITH

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO. 1387 OF 2019

¶7

Shree Abhishek Arun } Survase, Minor, through } guardian Shree Arun D. } Survase } Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra } and Ors. } Respondents

¶8

WITH

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO. 1398 OF 2019

¶10

Shri.Omkar Arun Survase } Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra } and Ors. } Respondents

¶11

Mr.Laxman Bedekar with Ms.Meenal Deshmukh I/b. Ms.Ranjana Deokar for the petitioner.

¶12

Mr.V.M.Mali-AGP for State in WP Nos.1385/2019 and 1387/2019.

¶13

Mr.S.B.Kalel-AGP for State in WP/1398/2019.

¶14

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & M. S. KARNIK, JJ.

¶15

DATE :- FEBRUARY 12, 2019

¶16

Page 1 of 2

¶17

J.V.Salunke,P.S.

¶18

907to909-WP.1385.2019+2.doc

¶19

P.C. :-

¶20

After these petitions were heard for some time on the earlier occasion, all that we expected was a response from the scrutiny committee and which would reflect its willingness to assist parties like the petitioners. Now, having taken instructions from the second respondent, the learned AGP says that the scrutiny committee will complete its task and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and in any event, within a period of three months from today.

¶21

In these circumstances, each of these petitions are disposed of. They are disposed of with the direction that the scrutiny committee should pass final orders within a period of three months from today. The time would not be extended in any circumstances.

¶22

We clarify that we have expressed no opinion on merits and all contentions in that behalf are kept open.

¶23

With the aforesaid directions, the writ petitions are disposed of.

¶24

(M.S.KARNIK, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)

¶25

Page 2 of 2

¶26

J.V.Salunke,P.S.

Shri. Omkar Arun Survase v. the State of Maharashtra Thru Social Justice and Special Assistance Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shri. Omkar Arun Survase v. the State of Maharashtra Thru Social Justice and Special Assistance Dept. and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yajur Tyagi Vs Padmashree Dr. D. Y. Patil Vidyapeeth

Kumari Chinmayee Rajendra Thakur Vs the State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Dept of Tribal Development and Ors.

Ayurvidya Prasarak Mandal and Anr. Vs the State of Maharashtra and 6 Ors.

Shree Abhishek Arun Survase Minor Thru Guardian Shree Arun D Survase Vs the State of Maharashtra Thru Social Justice and Special Assistance Dept. and Ors.

Vinayak Deepak Surwase Vs the State of Maharashtra Thru Secretary, Tribal Development Dept. and Ors.

Mr. Shantaram Popatrao Khairnar Vs Kaivalya Vidyalaya, Retibunder, through Headmistress and Ors.