The bench listed two writ petitions wrongly on the board and directed their removal without engaging in substantive legal discussion.
Remove the writ petitions from the board.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
255 wp 1649-13-c.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1649 OF 2013
Kumari Chinmayee Rajendra Thakur … Petitioner versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents
AND
WRIT PETITION NO.8010 OF 2009
Akash s/o Satish Gavali … Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents
None for the petitioners. None for the respondents.
CORAM: DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ. & ABHAY AHUJA, J.
DATE: DECEMBER 07, 2022.
P.C.:
1. The writ petition is listed wrongly on board.
2. Remove the writ petition from the board.
(ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
Digitally signed by PRIYA PRIYA RAJESH RAJESH SOPARKAR SOPARKAR Date: 2022.12.09 10:58:54 +0530
1
prs
Kumari Chinmayee Rajendra Thakur
Akash s/o Satish Gavali
The State of Maharashtra
Dipankar Datta
Abhay Ahuja
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
