The Bombay High Court directed the competent authority to reconsider a request for furlough release and verify the petitioner's facts regarding delayed return from parole, requiring a fresh order within eight weeks.
Decision to reconsider furlough request and pass a fresh order within eight weeks after verification of facts.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Nalawade
15-wp-1383-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL W.P. NO. 1383 OF 2019
Bansi Bhimrao Gaikwad ….Petitioner
vs.
The State of Maharashtra ….Respondent.
Adv.Rohini Boez for the Petitioner. Mr. H.J.Dedhia, APP. for the State.
CORAM : B.P.DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 18th June, 2019
PC :
been denied on the ground that when petitioner was released on parole on 2.3.2015, he was required to be arrested and brought back after the delay
of about 66 days. For this late return punishment of remission cut of 333 days is already ordered.
Page-1/2
Nalawade
15-wp-1383-19.doc
shows that his mother expired on 29.7.2015, husband of his sister also died in accident and his wife needed to be operated.
(SMT. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.) ( B.P.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
Page-2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the competent authority should reconsider the request for release on furlough after verifying the petitioner's explanations for late return from parole.
Bansi Bhimrao Gaikwad
The State of Maharashtra
B. P. Dharmadhikari
Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
