High Court Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction considered a bail application filed by an accused whose co-accused were acquitted. The court rejected the bail plea, finding no case made out given the applicant's burden to explain the incident and the circumstances recorded by the trial court.
Bail application is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
rsk
13-APPA-375-19.doc
1/3
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.375 OF 2019 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.408 OF 2019
Salman Ayub Shaikh
...Applicant
vs.
The State of Maharashtra ...Respondent
Mr.Keshav Chavan for the Applicant. Mr. J.P. Yagnik, APP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM : B. P. DHARMADHIKARI & SWAPNA S. JOSHI, JJ. DATE : 17/06/2019.
P.C.:
. Heard. Learned counsel for the applicant-accused No.1 states that prosecution attempted to prove that accused No.1 who is husband killed his wife with assistance of accused Nos.2 and 3 in a car. Trial Court has exonerated accused nos.2 and 3.
rsk
13-APPA-375-19.doc
2/3
applicant states that there is no investigation about the same.
rsk
13-APPA-375-19.doc
3/3
(SMT. SWAPNA S. JOSHI, J.)
(B. P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail ought to be granted to the applicant accused given the trial court's exoneration of co-accused and medical evidence regarding injuries.
Whether the applicant discharged his burden to explain the circumstances of the death of his wife.
Salman Ayub Shaikh
The State of Maharashtra
B. P. Dhar madhikari
Swapna S. Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
