Petitioner challenged an interim maintenance order. Court set a deadline for depositing arrears. Ad-interim stay granted contingent on compliance; failure to deposit vacates order.
Listed for admission on 11th April, 2019; interim stay on proceedings granted subject to petitioner depositing arrears of maintenance within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
P1wpst34472019.odt
Shailaja
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION [STAMP] NO.3447 OF 2019
Rishi Gaurishankar Gupta ] Petitioner Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and others.] Respondents
Mr. Madan Gupta, learned Counsel for the Petitioner.
CORAM : R.G. KETKAR, J.
DATE : 3rd APRIL, 2019.
P.C.
Not on board. At the request of Mr. Gupta, taken up in the production board.
2. Heard Mr. Gupta, learned Counsel for the petitioner.
1 of 2
P1wpst34472019.odt
He states that the trial Court has fixed the matter on 12th April, 2019 for proceeding against the petitioner herein in case, he does not comply the impugned order.
[R.G. KETKAR, J.]
2 of 2
Rishi Gaurishankar Gupta
The State of Maharashtra and others
R.G. Ketkar
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
