This single-paragraph order disposed of a writ petition concerning a pending proposal for the bifurcation of a Grampanchayat, directing the respondent to decide within six months.
Respondent No.1 directed to decide the pending proposal on bifurcation within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
936 WRIT PETITION NO.11636 OF 2017
VILLAGE PANCHAYAT, NAGALGAON
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr. K.P. Rodge, Advocate h/f Mr. P.G. Rodge, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. G.O. Wattamwar, AGP for respondents No.1 to 3
Mr. A.D. Kawade, Advocate h/f Mr. A.V. Hon, Advocate for respondent No.5
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH & SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI, JJ.
DATE:03rd DECEMBER, 2019
PER COURT:
1After hearing learned counsel for parties, it transpires that
proposal in respect of bifurcation/constitution of Grampanchayat as reflected
in writ petition is pending with respondent No.1. In the circumstances,
respondent No.1 may proceed to decide on the same as early as possible
preferably within a period of six months.
2Writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
( Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi ) ( Sunil P. Deshmukh )
JUDGEJUDGE
agd
VILLAGE PANCHAYAT, NAGALGAON
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
VIBHA KANKANWADI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court