Two writ petitions challenging the jurisdiction of the court were disposed of on merits, directing petitioners to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal, with liberty to avail of the alternate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 20-WP11066-19+.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
20 WRIT PETITION NO. 11066 OF 2019
Pandurang S/o Manik Thorat
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Another
.. Respondents
Mr. P. M. Nagargoje, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. S. B. Narwade, AGP for Respondents-State.
70 WRIT PETITION NO. 11132 OF 2019
Prakash S/o Yashwantrao Pawar .. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and Another .. Respondents
Mr. P. M. Nagargoje, Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. S. B. Yawalkar, Addl. G. P. for Respondents-State.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATED : 09th SEPTEMBER, 2019.
PER COURT :-
( ANIL S. KILOR ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE
P.S.B.
1 of 1
Pandurang S/o Manik Thorat
Prakash S/o Yashwantrao Pawar
The State of Maharashtra
Another
S. V. Gangapurwala
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
