Disposed

Shiakh Farroq Shaikh Habib v. Balasaheb Ramrao Kundgir

Bombay HC13 Sept 2019CP/420/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a contempt petition filed for non-compliance of an earlier order directed at an Education Officer. Upon acceptance of an undertaking by the learned AGP that the Deputy Director of Education would include the petitioner's name in the Shalarth Pranali scheme within two weeks, the Court held that the grievance no longer survives.

What did the court decide?

Contempt Petition disposed of as grievance no longer survives due to acceptance of undertaking regarding inclusion of petitioner's name.

Shiakh Farroq Shaikh Habib Vs Balasaheb Ramrao Kundgir — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶2

941 CONT. PETITION NO.420 OF 2019

¶3

IN WP/14019/2018

¶4

SHIAKH FARROQ SHAIKH HABIB
VERSUS

¶5

BALASAHEB RAMRAO KUNDGIR

¶6

...

¶7

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr.Bobade Yogesh K.
Advocate for Respondent State : Mr.K.S. Patil

¶8

...

¶9

 CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND
 AVINASH G.GHAROTE, JJ.
 DATED : 13th SEPTEMBER, 2019.

¶10

ORAL ORDER:

¶11

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶12

2.A grievance having been raised in this
petition for non compliance of the order of this Court,
simple notice was issued to sole respondent (Respondent
No. 4 in W.P.). By order dated 18.12.2018, respondent
No. 4 Education Officer (Secondary) was directed to
decide the proposal within the stipulated period on its
merits and in accordance with the law and procedure.

¶13

3.Today the learned AGP placed on record the
proposal forwarded to the Deputy Director of the

¶14

2 cp420.19

¶15

Education, Latur, dated 20th August, 2019 by the

¶16

respondent Education Officer, for inclusion of the

¶17

name of the petitioner under the modality known as ' Shalarth Pranali '.

¶18

4.The learned AGP on instructions from the

¶19

officer of Education Department, who is present in
the Court, submits that the Deputy Director of
Education, Latur, Dist; Latur, would pass appropriate
orders within two weeks for inclusion of the name of
the petitioner in 'Shalarth Pranali'. This submission
is accepted as an undertaking to this Court.

¶20

5.In view of the above, the grievance of the
petitioner no more survives. The Contempt Petition is
accordingly disposed of.

¶21

 (AVINASH G. GHAROTE) (PRASANNA B. VARALE)
JUDGEJUDGE

¶22

mahajansb/

Shiakh Farroq Shaikh Habib v. Balasaheb Ramrao Kundgir

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiakh Farroq Shaikh Habib v. Balasaheb Ramrao Kundgir

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prakash Yhashwantrao Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Bhagchand Kimmatram Adwani and 3 Ors. Vs Municipal Council Chandrapur Thr. Its Chief Officer

Sunil Radhavallabh Mundada Vs Mahendra Narayan Kabra and Others

Shamrao Dadu Waghmare Vs Ashabai Bhau Avchitte

Rahul Naval Mali Vs Neeta W/O Rahul Mali and Anr.

The Ex. Engineer, Lower Terna Division - 2 Latur and Ors. Vs Maruti Rama Ghodake