The High Court directed a government school authority to reconsider the petitioner's entitlement to compassionate pension, holding that resignation does not automatically preclude such relief under applicable rules.
Directed Third Respondent to reconsider petitioner's entitlement for compassionate pension within six months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
16-wp-11027-14.doc
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11027 OF 2014
Shri Lalasaheb Nanasaheb Thorat
.. Petitioner
Vs.
State of Maharashtra and Ors.
None for the petitioner. Mr. K. S. Thorat, AGP for respondent Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM: PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, CJ. & N. M. JAMDAR, J.
JULY 09, 2019.
P.C.
2/2
16-wp-11027-14.doc note of the relevant Rule governing compassionate pension. The order impugned shows that the authority concerned has misdirected itself in as much as Petitioner’s case for compassionate pension has been rejected on the ground that having resigned from service, he is not admissible to grant of any pension.
N. M. JAMDAR, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether resignation from service bars the grant of compassionate pension.
Whether the authority correctly applied rules governing compassionate pension to the petitioner.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Lalasaheb Nanasaheb Thorat
State of Maharashtra
Praadeep Nandrajog
N. M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
