The High Court at Bombay dismissed a PIL for want of prosecution due to the non-appearance of the petitioners on four consecutive dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(21)-PIL-40-15.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.40 OF 2015
Shri. Chereshwar Mitra Mandal and another ..Petitioners Versus State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents
None for the Petitioners.
Mr. H. S. Venegaonkar, Addl. Govt. Pleader for Respondent Nos.1, 3 & 4 – State.
Ms. K. H. Mastakar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2, 6 & 7 – MCGM.
Mr. S. R. Rajguru a/w Mr. Sandesh Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.8.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & N. M. JAMDAR, J.
th JULY, 2019
P.C.
On the four consecutive dates, there is no appearance on behalf of the Petitioners. The Public Interest Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
N. M. JAMDAR, J CHIEF JUSTICE
1 o f 1
BGP.
Shri. Chereshwar Mitra Mandal
State of Maharashtra
Pradeep Nandrajog
N. M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
