The High Court disposed of a writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to withdraw it. The court explicitly stated it made no adjudication on the merits or the availability of remedies before the Appellate Authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wpl-1089.19.docx
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (L) NO.1089 OF 2019
M/s. Cancure Pharma … Petitioner Vs.
Union of India … Respondent
Ms. Trupti A. Bharadi for the Petitioner. Ms. Uma Palsule – Desai, AGP for the Respondent - State.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 3rd APRIL 2019.
P.C. :
. Not on Board. Taken on Board.
1 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner after arguing the petition for some time seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file appropriate proceeding before the Appellate Authority. Petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty as prayed. We, however, make it clear that we have made no adjudication on the question whether the petitioner has any remedy available before the Appellate Authority. All contentions on merits are kept open.
1 of 1
M/s. Cancure Pharma
Union of India
A.S. Oka
M.S. Sanklecha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
