The High Court, Bombay, disposed of Writ Petition No. 1000 of 2017 on the petitioner's prayer to withdraw the petition subject to liberty to file a civil suit and preservation of merit contentions.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn; liberty reserved to file civil suit; merits kept open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp-1000.17.docx
pmw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1000 OF 2017
Mr. Vilas P. Kharche ... Petitioner Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Abhijit Y. Patil for the Petitioner. Mr. L.T. Satelkar, AGP for the Respondent No.1.
Mr. Nikunj Mehta and Ms. Raveena Yadav I/b. Ashok Purohit & Co. for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4.
M. A.G. Surana I/b. Mr. S.G. Surana for the Respondent No.6.
CORAM : A.S.OKA AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ. DATE : 3rd APRIL 2019.
P.C. : 1 The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on instructions seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of as withdrawn. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner prays that liberty may be reserved to file a civil suit for seeking appropriate relief. We make it clear that subject to all objections which may be raised by the respondents, it will be open for the petitioner to file a civil suit notwithstanding withdrawal of the petition. All contentions on merits are kept open. Pending notices of motion do not survive and the same are disposed of.
1 of 1
Vilas P. Kharche
State of Maharashtra
Respondents 2 to 4
Respondent No.6
A.S. Oka
M.S. Sanklecha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
