The Writ Petition, based on a misapprehension that permission to establish a college was granted, was disposed of as infructuous since no such permission had been issued to the other party.
The Writ Petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(901) WP 10778-16
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Amk
WRIT PETITION NO. 10778 OF 2016
Sadguru Shikshan Sanstha & Anr. .. Petitioners Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Ms. Anushree Kurup i/b Mr. D. V. Sutar for the Petitioners. Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for Respondent No.1-State. Mr. Sambhaji Kharatmal i/b Mr. Amit Bonkar for Respondent No.2.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 4th JULY, 2019.
P. C. :
1/2
(901) WP 10778-16
[N. M. JAMDAR, J.]
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
2/2
Sadguru Shikshan Sanstha
Dnyan Vidnyan Shikshan Prasarak Mandal
State of Maharashtra
Pradeep Nandrajog
N. M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
