A single judgment disposed of four connected contempt petitions filed against the State of Maharashtra. The court held the petitions infructuous because the alleged contempts had been complied with by the time of hearing.
The petitions were disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 18 CP 31 32 33 34 -2018.doc
Sequeira
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 31 OF 2018
Mr.Sachin Jamu Gavit and another .. Petitioners Vs
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
Along with CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 32 OF 2018
Mr.Dipak Jagannath Jadhav and another .. Petitioners Vs
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
with
CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 33 OF 2018
Mr.Ramchandra Laxman Zore and another .. Petitioners Vs
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
with CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 34 OF 2018
Ms.Sujata Sarjerao Sonawale and another .. Petitioners Vs The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
Mr.Ashutosh B.Patil i/b Ms.Ashwini N.Bandiwadekar, for Petitioners in all Petitions.
Mr.M.M.Pabale – Addl. Government Pleader, for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
2 18 CP 31 32 33 34 -2018.doc
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & N.M.JAMDAR, J. Date : 4 July, 2019.
P.C. :
Learned counsel for the Petitioners states that after the Petitions were filed seeking action to be taken against Respondents for having committed contempt of this Court, the orders noncompliance whereof is alleged to be an act of contempt, have been complied with. Petitions are accordingly disposed of as infructuous.
N.M.JAMDAR, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
Mr. Sachin Jamu Gavit
Mr. Dipak Jagannath Jadhav
Mr. Ramchandra Laxman Zore
Ms. Sujata Sarjerao Sonawale
The State of Maharashtra
Pradeep Nandrajog
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
