Allowed
Mangala Suresh Khadase v. the State of Maharashtra and Others
Bombay HCWP/10736/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
( 1 ) 10736.16wp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 10736 OF 2016
MANGALA SURESH KHADASE ...PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS
Mr. V.D. Hon, Senior Advocate i/b Mr. A.V. Hon, Advocate
for the petitioner;
Smt. G.L. Deshpande, A.G.P. for respondent/State
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE &
R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.
DATED :2nd JULY, 2019
OPERATIVE ORDER:
For the reasons separately recorded, the
petition is allowed. The petitioner to submit an
undertaking to this court within two weeks from today
that till the petitioner retires from her services, she
will serve with the State Government and will not opt for
( 2 ) 10736.16wp voluntary retirement prior to the completion of her service.
[R.G. AVACHAT, J.] [PRASANNA B. VARALE,J.]
Tupe
Mangala Suresh Khadase
The State of Maharashtra
Prasanna B. Varale
R.G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court