The petitioner withdrew the contempt petition. The court permitted withdrawal and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Withdrawal of the present petition allowed and matter disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
92.19cp
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.92 OF 2019 IN
WRIT PETITION NO.4543 OF 2017
Shashank s/o Shivajirao Chimanshette
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra & ors.
..RESPONDENTS
Mr V. G. Kodale, Advocate holding for Mr V. D. Gunale, Advocate for petitioner;
Mrs A. V. Gondhalekar, A.G.P. for respondent No.1
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND R. G. AVACHAT, JJ.
ATE : 2nd July, 2019
ORAL ORDER:
Learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, on oral instructions, prays for withdrawal of the present petition. A simple notice was issued by this Court 8th February, 2019.
(R. G. AVACHAT, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)
sjk
Shashank s/o Shivajirao Chimanshette
The State of Maharashtra
Prasanna B. Varale
R. G. Avachat
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
