In a writ petition, the High Court disposed of the matter based on consent terms agreed upon by the petitioner bank and the respondent employee, who were present in court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 903.1064.16 wp.doc
ISM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1064 OF 2016
The President Pandharpur Merchants .....Petitioners Cooperative Bank Ltd and another
V/s.
Meerasaheb Mohiddin Dalwale .....Respondent
Mr. Suhas Inamdar for the Petitioner Mr. A. V. Kalelkar i/b Jaydeep Deo for respondent no. 1
CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.
DATE : OCTOBER 16, 2019.
P.C.
Heard. Copy of Resolution No. 15 dated 28/08/2019 passed by
the petitioner-Cooperative Bank is placed on record alongwith consent terms. Consent terms are taken on record and marked as ‘X’ for the purpose of identifcation.
are personally present in the Court who are identifed their
2 903.1064.16 wp.doc
respective counsel. Parties who are present have agreed to consent
terms and have identifed their signatures thereon.
[NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.]
The President Pandharpur Merchants Cooperative Bank Ltd
Meerasaheb Mohiddin Dalwale
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
