Single-judge order allowing an application to bring legal heirs of a deceased respondent on record, condoning delay and permitting amendments.
Application allowed; delay condoned; amendments directed within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Pradnya Bhogale 1 10 cas 1414-19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1414 OF 2019
IN
SECOND APPEAL NO.66 OF 2009
Chetan Mohan Goski and Ors.… Applicants
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Rakhmaji Kondiba Wankar
(since deceased) through L.Rs.
1. Kalawati Rakhmaji Wankar and Ors.… Appellants
Vs.
Venkatesh Rajanna Goski
(since deceased) through L.Rs.
1. Chandrabhaga Venkatesh Goski
(since deceased)and Ors.… Respondents
Mr. Sagar Kursija I/b. Mr. T.D. Deshmukh for the applicants.
Mrs. Sangita Kalsekar I/b. Pallavi Dabholkar for
respondent/original appellant.
CORAM: M. S. KARNIK, J.
DATE : 15th OCTOBER, 2019.
P. C.:
1.This is an application for bringing the legal heirs of
respondent No.3 on record. The respondent No.3 died on
24.03.2014. Learned counsel appears for heirs of respondent
No.3 i.e. 3a to 3c.
1 of 2
Pradnya Bhogale 2 10 cas 1414-19.doc
2.For the reasons mentioned in the application, the delay
in filing the application is condoned.
3.The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause
(b) and (b1).
4.Necessary amendments to be carried out within four
weeks from today.
5.The Civil Application is disposed of.
( M. S. KARNIK, J. )
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone delay and allow application to include legal heirs of a deceased respondent on record.
Chetan Mohan Goski and Ors.
Rakhmaji Kondiba Wankar (since deceased) L.Rs.
Venkatesh Rajanna Goski (since deceased) L.Rs.
M. S. KARNIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court