The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition, which was not yet admitted. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor had no objection. Consequently, the High Court disposed of the Writ Petition as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
39-wp-103.2014.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 103 OF 2014
Sanjay Tansukhdas Panjwani … Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra and Ors. … Respondents
Mr.Manish Rai for the Petitioner.
Mr. K.V. Saste, APP for the respondent State.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ. DATE : MARCH 05, 2019
P.C. :
Learned counsel for the petitioner upon instructions seeks
leave to withdraw the petition. Petition is still not admitted. Learned APP appearing for respondent nos. 1 and 5 has no objection. Hence, Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.) (B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1/1
nilegaonkar
Sanjay Tansukhdas Panjwani
State of Maharashtra
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
REVATI MOHITE DERE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
