This order disposed of a criminal application seeking quashing of an FIR between neighbourly parties. The court observed the dispute was trivial and granted the rule absolute to quash the FIR.
Rule made absolute to quash the FIR as prayed in prayer clause (a).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
17-apl-142.2019.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 142 OF 2019
Mohd. Tariq Imtiyaz Shaikh and anr. … Applicants Versus Sr. Police Inspector and anr. … Respondents
Mr. Mateen A.A. Shaikh for the applicants.
Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for the respondent State.
Mr.Arshad Shaikh for respondent no. 2.
Mr. D.R. Tone, PSI Kurla Police Station present.
CORAM : B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & REVATI MOHITE DERE, JJ. DATE : MARCH 05, 2019
P.C. :
Heard respective counsel. Applicant as also respondent no.2 are present. Similarly minor is also present. They are jointly requesting for quashing of FIR. Parties are neighbours and the manner in which the events transpire show that it was a trivial issue.
In this situation, by warning the applicants and also respondent no. 2 not to indulge in such conduct again, we make the rule absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
(REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.)
(B.P. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)
1/1
nilegaonkar
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the FIR in a trivial dispute between neighbours warrants quashing.
Mohd. Tariq Imtiyaz Shaikh and anr.
Sr. Police Inspector
B.P. DHARMADHIKARI
REVATI MOHITE DERE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
