The High Court of Bombay at Goa disposed of Income Tax Appeal No. 59 of 2016 by granting leave to the appellant to withdraw the appeal, as the tax involved was below 50 lakh.
Leave to withdraw the appeal granted; appeal disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 txa59-19-dt.4-3-19
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA TAX APPEAL NO. 59 OF 2016
The Principal Commissioner
of Income Tax.….. Appellant.
Versus
Shri Mahalasa Power Rentals. …... Respondent.
Ms. Amira Abdul Razaq, Junior Standing Counsel for the Appellant.
Mr. Vinkatesh Ameya Nayak Salatry, Advocate for the Respondent.
Coram : M.S. Sonak &
Prithviraj K. Chavan, JJ.
Date : 4 March 2019.
P.C.:
1. Ms. Amira Razaq, learned Standing Counsel for the Appellant, on the basis of written instructions dated 19.2.2019, seeks leave to withdraw this Appeal, in view of the CBDT Circular No.3/2018, dated 11/7/2018, as amended on 20.08.2018. This is because the tax effect involved in the present Appeal is below 50.00 ₹ lakhs. Written instructions dated 19.2.2019 are taken on record and marked “X” for identification.
2.Leave is granted. The appeal is disposed of.
(Prithviraj K. Chavan, J.) (M.S. Sonak, J.)
The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax
Shri Mahalasa Power Rentals
M.S. Sonak
Prithviraj K. Chavan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court