State of Goa, through the Chief Secretary., v. Hanamata Rao M. Kulkarni.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC.CIVIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 250 OF 2019 IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 440 OF 2015
STATE OF GOA, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY.,
... Applicant
Versus
HANAMATA RAO M. KULKARNI.,
... Respondent
Ms. Priyanka Kamat, Additional Government Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.V. Nayak Salatry, Advocate for the respondent.
Coram:M. S. SONAK & PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, JJ. Date:4th March 2019
P.C.
Respondents are granted additional time of one week to file their reply. The petitioner may also file their rejoinder, if they choose to within a week from the date of the receipt of the affidavit in reply.
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN, J. M. S. SONAK, J.
vn
STATE OF GOA, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY
HANAMATA RAO M. KULKARNI
M. S. SONAK
PRITHVIRAJ K. CHAVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court