Disposed

Shravan Rajendra Kapoor v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Bombay HC22 Jan 2019REVN/263/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a criminal revision application where parties settled a matrimonial dispute involving joint bank account closure and maintenance deposit withdrawal. The court permitted the parties to visit a bank for the agreed transaction.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Revision Application disposed of on the basis of settlement and consent terms; parties directed to visit bank.

Shravan Rajendra Kapoor Vs State of Maharashtra and… — Maintenance and Alimony | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

903-revn-263-2016.doc

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶3

CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION No. 263 OF 2016

¶4

Shravan Rajendra Kapoor

¶5

...Applicant

¶6

Versus

¶7

State of Maharashtra & Ors.

¶8

...Respondents

¶9

-----

¶10

Ms.Pallavi Gandhi I/b. Mr.Rajeev Matkar for the Applicant. Mrs. Veera Shinde, APP for Respondent No.1-State. Ms.Racheeta R. Dhuru for Respondent No.2.

¶11

-----

¶12

CORAM : MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J. DATE : 22 JANUARY 2019

¶13

P.C.:

¶14

The learned counsel for the applicant-husband informs the Court that

¶15

both the parties have settled the matter and filed the consent terms before the Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai. So also, the D.V. proceedings pending before the learned 44^th Metropolitan Magistrate Court, Andheri, Mumbai is settled.

¶16

Both the parties are present in the Court.

¶17

The learned counsel for respondent No.2- wife concedes to the said

¶18

point. However, a joint request is made by the learned counsel for both the

¶19

1/2

¶20

Trupti

¶21

903-revn-263-2016.doc

¶22

parties that they would like to go to Axis Bank, Andheri, Mumbai as they hold a joint account that is to be closed and the money should be transferred to respondent No.2- wife's account thereafter.

¶23

The learned counsel for the applicant-husband, after taking instructions from the applicant-husband, concedes and confirms the submissions of the learned counsel for respondent No.2- wife. She submits that pursuant to the order dated 5^th May, 2016 passed by this Court in the said Revision Application, the applicant-husband has deposited 50% of the outstanding amount of maintenance. She further submits that the said amount is allowed to be withdrawn by the applicant-husband as he has already paid Rs.20,00,000/- to respondent No.2-wife as a full and final settlement.

¶24

The learned counsel for respondent No.2-wife submits that respondent No.2-wife has no objection for withdrawal.

¶25

Both the parties are agreed to go to Axis Bank, Andheri, Mumbai either on 23^rd January, 2019 or 24^th January, 2019 at 1.00 noon.

¶26

In view of the above, Criminal Revision Application is disposed of.

¶27

(MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)

¶28

2/2

¶29

Trupti

Shravan Rajendra Kapoor v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shravan Rajendra Kapoor v. State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Archita Pranav Thaker Vs Pranav Ashok Thaker and Ors.

Dilipkumar Subhash Jaiswal Vs the State of Maharashtra

Manoj Taurani Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Henry Samuel Jacob Vs the State of Maharashtra

Santosh Pandurang Patil Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.

Tanaji Raghunath Mate and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra and Anr.