submissions of the learned counsel are in the nature of asking this Court to reappreciate and reassess merits of the petition afresh and then to consider the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court on merits in entirety. We are afraid that, the limited scope of the review petition would not permit us to entertain the review application for reassessment of the merits. It may not be out of place to state that, in its detailed order, this Court referred to the contentions raised, the policy of the State Government, the submissions and counter submissions, the material placed on record by way of affidavit-in-reply and then passed the order. There is no dispute that the review application can be entertained on limited ground such as error apparent on the face of the order or suppression of the fact whereby the court is misled. None of such grounds is coming forth in the application or in the submissions of the counsel. At the cost of repetition, we say that, learned counsel made an attempt to canvass before this Court, which was in the nature of reappreciation and reassessment of the facts and merits.
