Disposed

Shirdi Nagar Panchayat Shirdi through Chief Officer Satish Ganpatrao Dighe v. Sanjay Bhaskarrao Kale and Others

Bombay HC17 Jun 2019CA/2427/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Aurangabad approved the remuneration of a scrutiny committee for a Shirdi Nagar Panchayat at Rs.10,000/- per member and directed the Government Pleader to disburse the funds within two weeks, while keeping specific contentions open.

What did the court decide?

Remuneration for committee members quantified at Rs.10,000/- each; Government Pleader directed to disburse within two weeks.

Shirdi Nagar Panchayat Shirdi through Chief… — Public Procurement and Tenders | Bombay HC (2019)

¶1

C.A.2427.19

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2427 OF 2019 IN

¶4

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.86 OF 2018

¶5

Shirdi Nagar Panchayat. Shirdi, Taluka Rahata, District Ahmednagar, through its Chief Officer, Satish Ganpatrao Dighe

¶6

..Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

Sanjay s/o Bhaskarrao Kale and ors.

¶9

..Respondents

¶10

Mr V.D. Hon, Senior Counsel i/b Mr A.V. Hon, Advocate for applicant Mr A.B. Girase, Government Pleader for respondent-State Ms P.S. Talekar, Advocate for Talekar & Associates for petitioner in P.I.L. Mr N.R. Bhavar, Advocate for respondent no.2 in P.I.L.

¶11

CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND R.G. AVACHAT, JJ.

¶12

DATE : 17.6.2019

¶13

PER COURT :

¶14

In response to our order dated 10^th June 2019, the committee consisting of Advocates Mr S.V. Varad and Mr C.V. Dharurkar placed its report for the perusal of this Court.

¶15

¶16

2427.19ca

¶17

Learned Counsel Ms Talekar appearing for the non-applicant no.1 – Sanjay Bhaskarrao Kale (original petitioner) submitted that Section 21 of Shri Saibaba Sansthan Trust (Shirdi) Act 2004 deals with the modalities of utilisation and expenditure of the funds. Our attention was invited to Section 21 (2) (ii) of the Act to submit that one scrutiny committee scrutinises the proposals forwarded to it in respect of the improvement and augmentation of the local civic services and amenities. On our query, learned Counsel Mr Bhavar, appearing for the Sansthan sought some time to place before this Court the minutes of the scrutiny committee along with other material. Mr Bhavar to place before this Court the minutes of the last meeting of the scrutiny committee.

¶18

We appreciate the response of the committee in preparation of the fact finding report and placing the same before this Court. We deem it appropriate to quantify the remuneration of the committee members at the rate of Rs.10,000/- (Rs.Ten thousand) each.

¶19

Learned Government Pleader to make all possible arrangements to disburse the amount to the committee members within two weeks from today.

¶20

¶21

2427.19ca

¶22

The application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (A) only at present keeping the contentions open. In so far as prayer clause (B) is concerned, stand over to 4^th July 2019.

¶23

( R.G. AVACHAT, J.)

¶24

( PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.)

¶25

vvr

Shirdi Nagar Panchayat Shirdi through Chief Officer Satish Ganpatrao Dighe v. Sanjay Bhaskarrao Kale and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shirdi Nagar Panchayat Shirdi through Chief Officer Satish Ganpatrao Dighe v. Sanjay Bhaskarrao Kale and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vishwanath Vithalrao Gaikwad Vs Manisha Patankar Mhaiskar and Others

Shaikh Afsar Shaikh Imam Vs Manisha Patankar Mhaiskar and Others

Dharmpal Shankar Ambegave Vs Manisha Patankar Mhaiskar and Others

Sitaram S/O Biraji Ramandwal Vs the State of Maharashtra

Virendra Shekhar Ichalkaranjikar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Vijaykumar Sadashivrao Somthankar Vs Nipun Vinayak the Municipal Commissioner Aurangabad and Another