A single paragraph order where the High Court at Bombay dismissed a Writ Petition filed by Human Rights Protection and Awareness as not pressed by the counsels.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 76 OF 2018
Human Rights Protection and Awareness, Pune … Petitioner.
V/s.
Union of India and Ors.
... Respondents.
Mr. R.D. Patil for the Petitioner.
Mr. M.M. Pabale, AGP for Respondents 2 and 3.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG,C.J. & N.M. JAMDAR, J.
DATE : 4 JUNE 2019. P.C. :-
After some arguments, Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition. The Petition is dismissed as not pressed.
N.M. JAMDAR, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
Human Rights Protection and Awareness
Union of India
Pradeep Nandrajog
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
