Petitioner sought wages and school reopening due to employment termination. Court rejected petition as not maintainable due to vague pleadings regarding aided status and entitling facts, allowing later filing with proper averments.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
10-wp-11285-16.doc
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 11285 OF 2016
Shri Manoj Ganpat Gidde
.. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
.. Respondents
Mr. V. R. Garad for petitioner. Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for State.
CORAM: PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, CJ. & N. M. JAMDAR, J.
JUNE 03, 2019.
P.C.
2/2
10-wp-11285-16.doc entitlement of employee of aided institution to be absorbed on closure? None has been pleaded. Case pleaded is that the school was suddenly closed down in October 2013. Prayer made in the writ petition is to pay wages to the petitioner from November 2013 with a direction that the school should be restarted.
N. M. JAMDAR, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
Shri Manoj Ganpat Gidde
The State of Maharashtra
Pradeep Nandrajog
N. M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
