High Court disposed of PIL regarding Metro Line Corridor-2 realignment in Pune by directing petitioners to file Vakalatnama in one of two pending PILs on the same issue to avoid multiplicity, without adjudication.
Directory to file Vakalatnama in one of the two pending PILs on the same issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1) PIL 63-19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Amk
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 63 OF 2019
Mr. Satish Khot & Anr. .. Petitioners
Vs.
State of Maharashtra & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Vivek Sharma for the Petitioners.
Ms. Kewal Anya a/w. Mr. Vishwanath Patil for Respondent No.2. Mr. P. P. Kakade, GP a/w. Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for Respondent No.1State.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 12th JULY, 2019.
P. C. :
1/2
(1) PIL 63-19
any one of the two pending Public Interest Litigations and the Registry is directed to take the same on record.
[N. M. JAMDAR, J.]
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
2/2
Mr. Satish Khot & Anr.
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Pradeep Nandrajog
N. M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
