Disposed
Haresh Tahikandas Chhetija and 2 Ors. v. Vimla Kewal Kapoor and 3 Ors.
Bombay HCNMCA/598/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
598-19 IN THE
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(25) NMCA 598-19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Amk
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 598 OF 2019
IN
COMMERCIAL APPEAL (L) NO. 227 OF 2019
IN
COMMERCIAL CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1320 OF 2018 IN
COMMERCIAL SUIT NO. 1280 OF 2018
Haresh Tahikandas Chhetija & Ors. .. Applicants
In the matter between
Haresh Tahikandas Chhetija & Ors. .. Appellants Vs. Vimla Kapoor & Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. Vishal Thaker a/w. Ms. Anjali Trivedi i/b V. Thakers for the Appellants/Applicants.
Ms. Hiral Vora i/b Maniar Srivastava Associate for Respondent Nos.2 & 3.
Ms. Ankita Singhania a/w. Mr. Akas Menon for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. &
N. M. JAMDAR, J. DATE : 11th JULY, 2019.
P. C. :
Motion, delay of 9 days in filing the Appeal is condoned.
[N. M. JAMDAR, J.]
[CHIEF JUSTICE]
1/1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 9-day delay in filing the appeal warrants condonation under the notice of motion.
Haresh Tahikandas Chhetija & Ors.
Vimla Kapoor & Ors.
Pradeep Nandrajog
N. M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court