Petitioners sought leave to withdraw a prolix writ petition with liberty to file a fresh one. The court granted liberty and dismissed the petition as not pressed.
Leave granted to withdraw the petition and file a fresh one; petition dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 60 OF 2018
The Conservation Action Trust and Anr. … Petitioners.
V/s.
Union of India and Ors.
... Respondents.
Ms. Gulnar Mistry I/b. Jayakars for the Petitioners. Ms. Geeta Shastri, AGP for Respondent Nos. 2 and 4 – State. Ms. Sharmila Deshmukh for Respondent No.5.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG,C.J. & N.M. JAMDAR, J.
DATE : 26 JUNE 2019.
P.C. :-
The Petition is prolix. It would take a lot of time to focus on the issue which the Petition intends to project.
2
not pressed.
N.M. JAMDAR, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
The Conservation Action Trust and Anr.
Union of India and Ors.
PRADEEP NANDRAJOG
N.M. JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
