128.13.doc JPP IN THE HIGH COURT OF…
Petition dismissed in default for non-appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
7-b. PIL 128.13.doc
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ATBOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 128 OF 2013
Parashram Sattappa Tavare and Ors.
… Petitioners.
V/s.
The Commissioner of Sugar and Ors.
... Respondents.
None for the Petitioners.
Mr. M.M. Pabale, AGP for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 8 – State. Mr. S.S. Patwardhan for Respondent No. 9 to 13. Mr. A.R. Verma a/w. Mr. D. Dubey for Respondent – UOI.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG,C.J. & N.M. JAMDAR, J.
DATE : 26 JUNE 2019.
P.C. :-
Since none appears for the Petitioners at the hearing today, the Petition is dismissed in default.
N.M. JAMDAR, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
Parashram Sattappa Tavare
The Commissioner of Sugar
Pradeep Nandrajog
N.M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
