This PIL was dismissed because the issues were previously concluded in W.P. No. 5528/2007 and public interest litigations cannot be used to challenge conversion orders.
Public Interest Litigation dismissed with no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
0307pil58.17
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 58/2017.
Fattesingh Bhalchandra Maradwar
Union of India and others.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Shri A.M. Ghare, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. M.P. Munshi, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Shri A.M. Deshpande, Addl.G.P. for Respondent Nos.2 to 4. Shri A.Parchure, Advocate for Respondent No. 5
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & VINAY JOSHI, JJ.
DATE : JULY 03, 2019.
Heard.
JUDGE JUDGE
Rgd.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Public Interest Litigation can be entertained to challenge a conversion order when the predecessor decided it only a person aggrieved can raise a challenge.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
decided on 08.06.2017Distinguished¶14
Writ Petition No.5528/2007
Fattesingh Bhalchandra Maradwar
Union of India
R.K. Deshpande
Vinay Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
