This short order dismisses a writ petition on the ground that it has become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
03.07.WP.343.17
1
IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 343/2017 (Laxman s/o Kashiramji Umale and others vs. The State of Maharashtra and others )
.............................................................................................................................................. Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Mr. R.S. Kalangiwale, Advocate for petitioner /s Mr. Anand Fulzele, Addl.GP for respondent nos.1 to 3
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & VINAY JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 3rd July, 2019
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that
the petition has become infructuous.
Writ Petition is dismissed as such.
JUDGEJUDGE
sahare
Laxman s/o Kashiramji Umale and others
The State of Maharashtra and others
R.K. DESHPANDE
VINAY JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court