Petitioner sought leave to withdraw the present Public Interest Litigation. The Court granted leave and disposed of the PIL as withdrawn.
Leave to withdraw the PIL granted; the PIL disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
27-pilst-18508-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (ST) NO.18508 OF 2017
Mr.Hemant B. Patil ...Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents ----
Mr.R.N. Kachave for the Petitioner.
Ms.R.A. Salunkhe, AGP for the Respondent-State.
---- CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ. DATE : 11th MARCH 2019
P.C.
(SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
N.S. Kamble page 1 of 1
Hemant B. Patil
State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Bharati H. Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
