The High Court of Bombay granted leave to the petitioner to withdraw a PIL as the reservation issue was rendered infructuous by the enactment of the Maharashtra SEBC Act 2018.
Leave to withdraw the petition was granted and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
11-pil-174-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.174 OF 2018
Mr.Hemant B. Patil ...Petitioner Versus State of Maharashtra Through Govt. Pleader & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.R.N. Kachave for the Petitioner.
Ms.R.A. Salunkhe, AGP for the Respondent-State.
---- CORAM : RANJIT MORE & SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.
DATE : 11th MARCH 2019
P.C.
(SMT.BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (RANJIT MORE, J.)
N.S. Kamble page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hemant B. Patil
State of Maharashtra
Ranjit More
Bharati H. Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
