The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench allowed the withdrawal of PIL no. 40 of 2019 with liberty to raise grievances before the Grievance Cell.
Petition allowed to be withdrawn with liberty to raise grievance before Grievance Cell.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
pil40.19.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 40 OF 2019
Kalpruksha Enterprises & others
Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr. A.G. Talhar, advocate for petitioners. Mrs. A.V. Gondhalekar, AGP for respondents no. 1 to 3.
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ. DATE : 11th March, 2019.
P.C. :
After arguing the petition for some time, Mr. Talhar, learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions prays for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to raise the grievance before the Grievance Cell.
NITIN W. SAMBRE PRASANNA B. VARALE JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
Kalpruksha Enterprises & others
The State of Maharashtra & others
Prasanna B. Varale
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
