This court, at the admission stage by consent, directed the Scrutiny Committee to decide the petitioner’s pending tribe claim within sixteen weeks.
Directions issued to the Scrutiny Committee to decide the petitioner’s tribe claim within sixteen weeks from the date of service of this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
{1}
wp3314.19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3314 OF 2019
Mahadev Laxman Mahandule
Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & others
Respondents
Mr. A.T. Kanawade, advocate for petitioner. Mrs. V.N. Patil Jadhav, AGP for all respondents.
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND
NITIN W. SAMBRE, JJ. DATE : 11th March, 2019.
P.C. :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
wp3314.19.odt
NITIN W. SAMBRE PRASANNA B. VARALE JUDGE JUDGE
dyb
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to issue directions to the Scrutiny Committee to decide the pending tribe claim within a stipulated period.
Whether the writ petition regarding pendency of tribe claim should be disposed of by consent at the admission stage.
Mahadev Laxman Mahandule
The State of Maharashtra
Prasanna B. Varale
Nitin W. Sambre
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
