Disposed
Vikrant S/O Prabhakar Gonnade v. Bank of Maharashtra, through Its General Manager, Pune and Another
Bombay HCPIL/37/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1206pil37.18.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
Public Interest Litigation No.37 of 2018
Vikrant s/o Prabhakar Gonnade Versus Bank of Maharashtra, Head Office, Pune, through its General Manager, and another.
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order
Shri P.N. Shende, Advocate for Petitioner.
Shri S.S. Ghate, Advocate for Respondents.
Coram : R.K. Deshpande & Vinay Joshi, JJ. Date : 12th June, 2019
The petitioner has filed a pursis dated 10-6-2019; the contents of which are reproduced below :
“ The Petitioner, hereinabove, most respectfully submits as under.
It is submitted that since the Petitioner has been issued with the appointment Order dated 08-05-2019, and therefore the grievance of the petitioner, has been redressed at the hands of the Respondent no.1 and 2 and therefore this Hon'ble Court may kindly Dispose Off the instant writ petition, in the light of this development, in the interest of justice.
Hence this pursis.”
Thus, the grievance of the petitioner is redressed.
Hence, the petition is permitted to be withdrawn and disposed
2
1206pil37.18.odt
of as such.
(Vinay Joshi, J.) (R.K. Deshpande, J.)
Lanjewar, PS
Vikrant s/o Prabhakar Gonnade
Bank of Maharashtra, Head Office, Pune
R.K. Deshpande
Vinay Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court