This PIL challenged a notification excluding an area from the eco-sensitive zone. The petition was dismissed with liberty to file a separate petition and to keep all grounds open.
Liberty granted to file separate petition challenging the notification.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 62/2015 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO: 946/2019
(Shri Vitthal Mahadeorao Gawande vs. vs. The State of Maharashtra and others)
................................................................................................................... Office Notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders
Shri M.V,.Mohokar, Adv. for petitioner Ms. N.P. Mehta, AGP for respondent nos. 1,2 , 4 to 8 Ms. M.R.Chandurkar, Adv.for respondent nos.3 and 9 Shri V.B.Bhise, Adv.for respodnent nos.10 and 11
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & VINAY JOSHI, JJ. DATED : 12th June, 2019.
Notification has already been issued excluding the area from the eco-sensitive zone. Hence, the application for amendment is filed challenging such a notification.
The PIL is dismissed. However, we grant liberty to the petitioner to file a separate petition challenging such a notification.
All grounds raised in the PIL are kept open.
The Civil Application does not survive. The same is disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGE
sahare
Vitthal Mahadeorao Gawande
The State of Maharashtra
R.K. DESHPANDE
VINAY JOSHI
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
