Dismissed
Sandesh Chandrakant Waikar v. the State of Maharashtra and 7 Others
Bombay HCPIL/30/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(14)-PIL-30-16.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.30 OF 2016
Sandesh Chandrakant Waikar ..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and others ..Respondents
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. Abhay Patki, AGP for the Respondent No.1 – State. Ms. Aparna Kalathil I/by Mr. P. G. Lad, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 5 & 8.
Mr. Dilip Shinde, Advocate for Respondent No.6.
Mr. Makarand Kale, Advocate for Respondent No.7.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & N. M. JAMDAR, J.
th JULY, 2019
P.C.
Since none appears for the Petitioner the Public Interest Litigation is dismissed for non prosecution.
N. M. JAMDAR, J CHIEF JUSTICE
1 o f 1
BGP.
Sandesh Chandrakant Waikar
The State of Maharashtra
Pradeep Nandrajog
N. M. Jamdar
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court