The petitioner, via representation, agreed to approach the Charity Commissioner regarding the PIL's subject matter. The court accordingly disposed of the public interest litigation without adjudication on the merits of the underlying dispute.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 21pilst 27882.18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (ST) NO. 27882 of 2018
Sudhir Ramchandra Karale ... Petitioner V/s. Joint Charity Commissioner & ors. ... Respondents
Mr.Nitin Deshpande for the petitioner.
Ms. Nisha Mehra, AGP for respondent-State.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, C.J. & B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.
03rd January, 2019.
P.C.
The learned Counsel appearing for petitioner submits that he
would make a representation to Charity Commissioner on the subject
issue. In view of the statement made, PIL stands disposed of.
B.P. COLABAWALLA, J CHIEF JUSTICE
L.S. Panjwani, P.S.
Sudhir Ramchandra Karale
Joint Charity Commissioner & ors.
Naresh H. Patil, C.J.
B.P. Colabawalla, J.
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
