A public interest litigation was dismissed for non-prosecution in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay.
PIL stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/1 24pil 116.13.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.116 of 2013
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of appearances, Court's or Judge's orders Court's orders or directions & Registrar’s orders.
None appears for the petitioner.
Mr.M.M.Pabale, AGP for respondents 1 to 10. Mr. Vijay Patil for respondent no.6.
CORAM : NARESH H. PATIL, C.J. & B.P.COLABAWALLA, J
03rd January, 2019.
P.C. :
None appears for the petitioner. PIL
stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
B.P.COLABAWALLA, J CHIEF JUSTICE
L.S. Panjwani, P.S.
Public Interest
Respondents 1 to 10
NARESH H. PATIL
B.P.COLABAWALLA
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
