Petitioner's PIL seeking State policy intervention dismissed due to repetition of matter concluded in a 2015 judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1401pil2.19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR
P.I.L. No.2 of 2019
Shridhar s/o Nanduji Ade Versus State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Department of Home, Mantralaya, Mumbai, and others.
Office Notes, Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders and Registrar's order
Shri A.S. Dhore, Advocate for Petitioner.
Shri A.M. Deshpande, Additional Government Pleader for Respondents.
Coram : R.K. Deshpande & Vinay Joshi, JJ. Dated : 14th January, 2019
The relief claimed in this petition is a matter of State policy. Similar petition, being Criminal P.I.L. No.5 of 2014, has already been disposed of by this Court on 15-7-2015.
We, therefore, do not find any reason to interfere in this P.I.L., which stands dismissed.
(Vinay Joshi, J.) (R.K. Deshpande, J.)
Lanjewar
Shridhar s/o Nanduji Ade
State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary, Department of Home, Mantralaya, Mumbai
R.K. Deshpande
Vinay Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
