The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, holding that an alternative remedy under Section 318 of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act is available.
Writ petition dismissed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Order
1401wp299.19
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.
WRIT PETITION NO. 299/2019.
Ku. Sadhana Narayan Solanke. - VERSUS-
State of Maharashtra and others.
Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court’s or Judge’s Orders or directions and Registrar’s orders.
Shri T.G. Bansod, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S.M. Uke, Addl.G.P. for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : R.K. DESHPANDE & VINAY JOSHI, JJ.
Heard.
remedy of filing Revision Application under Section 318 of the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayat and Industrial Townships Act, 1965. Writ
Petition is, therefore, dismissed. No costs. All
questions however, are kept open.
Rgd.
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable given the existence of an alternative statutory remedy.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ku. Sadhana Narayan Solanke
State of Maharashtra
R.K. Deshpande
Vinay Joshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
