This PIL regarding illegal Transferable Development Rights (TDR) allotments was disposed of as the High Court found that departmental inquiries had been completed, charge-sheets issued, and criminal actions taken against the officers involved, rendering further directions unnecessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1/2
106-pil-8-15.doc
pdp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO. 8 OF 2015
Suo Motu Petition High Court on its own motion
.. Petitioner
Vs.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
.. Respondents
None for the Petitioner. Mr. M. M. Pabale, AGP for Respondent Nos.1, 2 & 5.
CORAM: PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, CJ. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.
P.C.
2/2
106-pil-8-15.doc six officers on 7th August 2017. The response also brings out that an FIR for offences punishable under Sections 166-A, 167, 406, 408, 409, 418, 420, 468, 120-B read with Section 34 IPC and Section 13(1)(d)(ii) and 15 of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 have been registered in which 15 officers have been named as accused; one officer is absconding and others were granted anticipatory bail by this Court.
SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J. CHIEF JUSTICE
2 provisions across 2 enactments
State of Maharashtra & Ors.
Pradeep Nandrajog
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
