Rohit Manohar Joshi and Anr. v. Thane Municipal Corporation and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought leave to withdraw PIL No.148 of 2018. The High Court dismissed the PIL as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(109)-PIL-148-18.doc .
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.148 OF 2018
Rohit Manohar Joshi & Anr. ..Petitioners Versus Thane Municipal Corporation & Ors. ..Respondents
Mr. Zaman Ali, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mr. R. S. Apte, Senior Advocate I/by Mr. N. R. Bubna, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
Mr. K. S. Thorat, AGP for Respondent Nos.3, 3B, 3C, 4 & 6. Ms. Sharmila U. Deshmukh a/w Ms. Jaya Bagwe, Advocate for Respondnet No.4.
Mr. Ishwar Nankani & Ms. Divya Shetty I/by M/s. Nankani & Associates, Advocates for Respondent No.7.
CORAM : PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, C.J. & SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J.
DATE : 17th SEPTEMBER, 2019
P.C.
1] In view of the reply filed, counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Public Interest Litigation.
2] The PIL is dismissed as not pressed.
SMT. BHARATI DANGRE, J CHIEF JUSTICE
1 o f 1
BGP.
Rohit Manohar Joshi & Anr.
Thane Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Pradeep Nandrajog
Bharati Dangre
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court