Petitioner withdrew a PIL for lack of basic material. Court granted liberty to file fresh petition but warned of dismissal with heavy costs if filed without necessary material.
Petition disposed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file fresh petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.135 OF 2019
Ramesh s/o Janikram Bharate
..Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and ors.
..Respondents
Mr D.B. Pawar-Pathrekar, Advocate for petitioner Mr S.S. Dande, A.G.P. for respondent-State
CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE : 25.11.2019
ORAL ORDER :
( ANIL S. KILOR, J.)
vvr
Ramesh s/o Janikram Bharate
The State of Maharashtra
Prassanna B. Varale
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Litigation brought on behalf of the public interest rather than a personal grievance, relaxing the usual rule of locus standi.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
